Books and reading,  History

Why I am a feminist: ‘Normal Women’ by Philippa Gregory

Where to begin with this huge, sweeping non-fiction book? Perhaps with the title. In an interview I heard with the author (best known for her historical fiction featuring British royalty like the Plantagenet and Tudor women) she said that she wanted to write about the full gamut of women across 900 years of British history – from royal and aristocratic to peasant women. Because, at the times in which they lived, these were ‘normal’ women, doing what queens, noblewomen, tradeswomen and artisans and peasant farming women did.

I found that a compelling argument; more so since reading this grand work of research and narrative.

Why am I interested in the history of British women?

Apart from the fact that I inherited my fascination with history from my mother; as an Australian woman whose ancestors were almost all from England, Ireland or Scotland, the history of Britain and its women is also my history.

Also, my interest in family history is particularly focused on the women in my family tree, the people about whom it is most difficult to find information and records that extend beyond birth and baptism, marriage and babies, death and burial. I want to know what kind of lives they lived, what their likely interests or preoccupations might have been, what big and small events shaped them.

Ms Gregory sums up her motivation for writing the book as follows:

What we read as a history of our nation is a history of men, as viewed by men, as recorded by men.
Is 93.1 per cent of history literally ‘His Story’ because women don’t do anything? Are women so busy with their Biology that they have no time for History, like strict timetable choices – you can’t do both?…
Women are there, making fortunes and losing them, breaking the law and enforcing it, defending their castles in siege and setting off on crusade; but they’re often not recorded, or mentioned only in passing by historians, as they were just normal women living normal lives, not worthy of comment.

Normal Women pp1-2

The book begins with the Norman invasion in 1066 and ends at the modern era, in the 1990’s. In between it examines the lives of women over a range of topic areas, including: religion, violence, marriage, women loving women, women and the vote, prostitution, health, education, work, enslaved women and slave owners, single women, ideas about the ‘nature of women’, rape, sport, wealth and poverty, protest…It’s a huge expanse of information drawn from a wide range of sources.

In the process the real reason for the beginnings of the gender pay gap is revealed; also how the patriarchal systems of law and inheritance were imported and formalised by the Norman invaders; how accusations of rape were dealt with in the legal system and how this barely changed over centuries; when businesswomen and tradeswomen gained admission to important guilds and how they were later excluded; how a queen became the first woman to publish a book in English in her own name; how women worked together and also against each other; a sombre roll call of women martyrs who died for their religious beliefs during the early modern period and another of women murdered by husband, boyfriend or family member in 2019.

The author’s skill is evident in the way she has presented a mind-boggling array of historical facts and themes in a compelling narrative, with snippets of the names and stories of women across different circumstances that help to bring them to life for the reader.

And there are some Oh My God moments. Here are some that stayed with me:

  • Sixteen year old Emma de Gauder holding out against William I (aka the Conqueror) at a Norwich castle for three months and later going on the First Crusade with her husband.
  • Roman Catholic churches in the eight century hosting same-sex marriages (women marrying women) which were entered in the parish records in the usual way.
  • The old Anglo-Saxon word for ‘wife’ meant peace-weavers and ‘spinster’ originally meant the actual occupation (a woman who spun yarn.)
  • The 1624 Infanticide Act meant that women who could not prove that a baby had been stillborn would hang. There was no assumption of innocence and no accusation levelled at the father of the baby.
  • The sentence of death by burning at the stake was still being applied for crimes such as the murder of a husband in the 1700’s. It mattered not how violent, cruel or abusive the husband was. Husband-killing was seen as ‘petty treason’.
  • Forceps for difficulties in childbirth were invented in the 1700’s but kept a secret for three generations in order to increase the profits of the medical family concerned.
  • Housewives living in poverty were blamed for poor sanitation and high rates of disease and child mortality.
  • Syphilis was thought to occur spontaneously in the bodies of promiscuous women (read: prostitutes) and passed on to men.
  • Rape in marriage was thought to be impossible as their wedding vows meant that women gave consent to sexual acts from that time on.
  • The widespread belief (even into the early twentieth century) that women would become infertile if they were more highly educated: to quote from the book, a statement by a neurologist – If the feminine abilities were developed to the same degree as those of the make, her material organs would suffer, and we should have before us a repulsive and useless hybrid. (p460)
  • Male students at Oxford University were so appalled at the proposal that female graduates should be awarded their degrees on completion of their course of study – in 1948 – that they attacked the college residence of women students.
  • and so on and so on…

I dare any woman to read this book and not be thankful for feminism and the changes it has helped to bring about. But – it also highlights the fact that there is a long, long way to go before we can truly say we have achieved genuine equality for women of all classes, races, religious beliefs and family situations.

Normal Women is published by HarperCollins in November 2023.
My thanks to the publishers for a copy.

All about books, reading, writing - and history.

2 Comments

  • H’ch

    I’m listening to this book on Audible, narrated by Philippa Gregory herself. The facts are astounding and I’m extremely thankful that although there is work to be done, we’re moving in the right direction.
    I’m a little confused by the chapter on rape which states women are capable of rape and that it is recognised in U.K. Law; as far as I’m aware, a criminal case of rape cannot be brought against a female and the act can only be committed with a penis.
    Obviously, morally, this is a different matter and of course women are the perpetrators or sexual assault but it sounds as though Gregory has made an error here in stating that female rape is now recognised in U.K. Law.

    • Denise Newton

      I had not picked up on that point,interesting one. Perhaps it shows that the muddy waters around the issues to do with the criminality of rape, still continue, centuries on.
      The book is spectacular in its coverage of the journey of women through time, isn’t it? Would be interesting to hear the author’s narration, though generally I prefer to read non fiction in hard copy or ebook versions, as I often need to ‘see’ facts to better absorb the information. Not a problem with fiction, but with non fiction I find the audio version can flow over and around me, never to be absorbed!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.